ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025
Infrared thermal mapping of osteotomy: influence of drill diameter and implant system.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermographic-Infrared Changes During Surgical Osteotomy Influenced by the Motor Type, System, and Diameter.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Drill diameter and dental implant system influence heat generation during surgical osteotomy, affecting friction and temperature, which can impact osseointegration. The aim was to evaluate the influence of drill diameter, speed, and dental implant system on thermographic-infrared changes during surgical osteotomy. Materials and methods: An Results: The Osstem system generated the highest temperature with the second drill, reaching 25.85 ± 1.97°C. The Arcys system showed a notable temperature increase from 23.52 ± 1.09°C to 25.57 ± 0.58°C with the second drill. NeoBiotech exhibited an increase in temperature from 22.75 ± 0.69 °C to 25.57 ± 1.72 °C following the use of the third drill. Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in both basal and pilot drill temperatures (°C) across three implant systems ( Conclusion: The study found significant variations in temperature increase based on the implant system and drill diameter. Baseline temperature, pilot drill, and second drill temperatures were significant predictors of the third final drill temperature, while the implant system itself was not a significant factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.