Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025

Unmet dental care needs and reported reasons: a comparison between adults with and without disabilities.

Huabin Luo, Melissa Stancil, Mark E Moss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huabin LuoDepartment of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
Melissa StancilDepartment of Public Health, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, United States.
Mark E MossDepartment of Foundational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess disparities in unmet dental care needs between adults with and without disabilities and the reasons for not being able to get needed dental care. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). The main outcome variable was unmet dental care needs (yes/no)-not being able to get dental care when needed in the past 12 months. The independent variable, disability status, was classified by whether an individual has serious difficulty in conducting any of the following six activities: hearing, seeing, mobility, self-care, cognition, or independent living. The analytical sample included 11,288 adults ages 20 years and older. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between disability status (measured by any disability [yes/no], six different types[yes/no], and number of disabilities) and unmet dental care needs. The differences in reasons for not being able to get needed dental care were also assessed by disability status. Data analysis accounted for the complex survey design of NHANES. Results: Adults with any disability were more likely to have experienced unmet dental needs (AOR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.71-2.33) than those without disabilities. There was a linear relationship between the number of disabilities and higher odds of experiencing unmet dental care needs ( Conclusions: We found adults with disabilities had experienced more unmet dental needs. Further assistance including providing dental insurance coverage and mobile dental clinics is needed to help this disadvantaged population in access to dental care.

Indexed as

dental utilizationdisabilitydisparityreasons of unmet dental care needsunmet dental needs

Identifiers

PMID41113802
PMCPMC12528010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.