ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effect of different pediatric drugs on color stability of Bioflx crowns. Background: Bioflx crowns have emerged as a novel restorative option with the unique property of self-adaptability along with esthetics. Although Bioflx crowns have demonstrated promising clinical performance, their resistance to discoloration remains underexplored. Pediatric liquid medications, often administered to children, are known to cause staining in dental materials. Hence, this study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of different pediatric drugs on the color stability of Bioflx crowns. Materials and methods: A total of 25 Bioflx crowns ( Results: Color variance was least in the Amoxicillin group, followed by Augmentin, Metronidazole, Ibugesic, and I-Fer Kid, the group which showed the highest variance. Conclusion: From the findings of the present study, we can conclude that Bioflx crowns, when immersed in different syrup solutions, showed significant color change in all samples. However, it was not visible to the naked eye. Hence, Bioflx crowns can be considered as a suitable treatment option. Clinical significance: Bioflx crowns are a novel option in pediatric patients in restoring esthetics along with durability and flexibility; hence, maintaining the color stability of these crowns in the oral cavity is crucial for patient acceptance and satisfaction. How to cite this article: Saisree AV, Reshma PK, Dsouza EN,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.