Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113755›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025

Comparative Evaluation of Wet and Dry Swallowing in Assessing Eustachian Tube Function in Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

Suresh Kruthika, Jeevan Govindaraju, Hemanth N Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suresh KruthikaJSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Jeevan GovindarajuJSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0009-0002-8563-6528
Hemanth N ShettyJSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-1368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Eustachian tube is a pressure-equalizing structure, also called the auditory tube, connecting the middle ear to the nasopharynx. Eustachian tube dysfunction is a leading cause of middle-ear infections leading to tympanic-membrane perforation. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the Eustachian tube functioning before determining the management to avoid recurrent middle-ear infections. Objective: To compare the functional assessment of the Eustachian tube by measuring pressure changes in patients with tympanic-membrane perforation, during the Toynbee test. The effectiveness of wet versus dry swallowing, ease of swallowing, and test-retest reliability for both conditions were examined. Methods: The study included 52 ears with tympanic-membrane perforations. The Toynbee test involved applying positive pressure to the ear canal while participants performed dry and wet swallowing maneuvers to measure the resulting pressure changes (in daPa). Subjective difficulty ratings were obtained using a 10-point Likert-scale for both swallowing conditions. Additionally, test-retest reliability for each swallowing condition was evaluated in 20 ears. Results: The pressure changes observed between the open and closed phases during both swallowing conditions differed significantly. Wet swallowing exhibited a larger initial pressure change than dry swallowing ( Conclusion: Wet swallowing reliably assesses the Eustachian tube's function in tympanic-membrane perforation cases to aid in informed decision making on the possible method of tympanoplasty.

Indexed as

auditory tubeear infectionperforationpressure changetympanic membrane

Identifiers

PMID41113755
PMCPMC12530902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.