ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025
Cost Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Institutional Cohort and Population-Based Simulation.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In oral carcinoma patients classified as cN0, selective neck dissection (SND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may be used to stage the neck with equivalent oncological results. Objective: Compare the costs of SLNB and SND for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Analysis of institutional cohort and Markov chain model simulation using populational data. Results: We included 84 patients submitted to transoral resection and SLNB or SND and patients submitted only to SND. The mean cost was R$4,943,67 for SLNB and R$ 11,005.49 for SND with significant differences in length of stay (one versus three days, p < 0.001), operative time (92 versus 177 minutes, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital visits in 60 days (two versus eight, p < 0.001). For the simulation model, the probability of not finding the SLN ranged from 0.0% to 5.7% with 0.5% increments and the probability of occult neck metastasis ranged from 9.0% to 100.0% with 1% increments. The costs of SLNB increase progressively as the rate of occult neck metastasis increases. When this rate reaches 56%, the cost difference becomes not significant. With rates above 72%, SLNB becomes significantly more expensive than SND. Using a public database, we calculate a cost decrease ranging from 27.93% to 66.54% with SLNB adoption. Conclusion: SLNB adoption may significantly decrease the costs associated with early-stage oral cancer treatment. It would allow more patients to be treated with the same number of resources now available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.