ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025
Effect of Topical Intra-Auricular Lidocaine on Tinnitus: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tinnitus is a prevalent symptom and has no proven effective treatment. Clinical observations that some patients reported significantly improved tinnitus after topical ear drop administration of lidocaine motivated research on this drug. Objective: Evaluate the action of topical intra-auricular 10% lidocaine in suppressing tinnitus compared to placebo. Methods: This was a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The variations of the visual analog scale (VAS), tinnitus loudness, and the minimum masking level (MML) after intra-auricular lidocaine 10% were compared with a placebo. The same variables were compared with some sample features. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the action of lidocaine and placebo in tinnitus variation measured by VAS (p = 0.361), tinnitus loudness (p = 0.850), and MML. (p = 0.213). The VAS variation was statistically lower in patients with any hearing loss (p = 0.005); the tinnitus loudness variation was higher in patients with tinnitus modulation (p = 0.049) and lower in patients with any hearing loss (p = 0.045). The MML variation was lower in patients with bruxism/TMD (p = 0.026). Conclusion: In this study the action of lidocaine on the variation of tinnitus intensity was similar to placebo. We believe that the use of manipulated medication may have interfered in the outcome and that the large number of patients with positive response to placebo should be investigated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.