ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2025
Neutralization and Anti-S Antibody Titers in SARS-CoV-2 Boosted Adults in Mexico: A Comparison Across Five Vaccine Types.
Article in International journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the administration of booster doses after completing primary vaccination. Yet, recommendations are largely based on a small set of vaccines, with little information about vaccine mixes used in low and middle-income countries. We aimed to estimate the titers of anti-protein S (RBD) IgG antibodies and neutralization in Mexican adults with a complete vaccination scheme without a booster or with one of five different booster types (heterologous or homologous) to assess immunogenic response. Materials and Methods: We included data from 2953 adults aged 18 years and older, representing 49.1 million Mexicans, from the National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT) 2022. We included five primary schemes: BNT162b2, AZD1222, Ad5-nCoV, Gam-COVID-Vac, and CoronaVac. A booster dose was defined as an additional dose beyond the primary scheme and classified as homologous or heterologous based on three vaccine platforms: mRNA, viral vector, and inactivated virus. For each primary scheme, we estimated marginal means of anti-protein S geometric mean titers (GMTs) with 95% CI in each group (no booster, heterologous booster, or homologous booster) adjusted for age, time since the last dose, and prior natural infection using anti-protein N antibodies seropositivity as a proxy using a multivariable linear regression. Then, we estimated the percentage of neutralizing antibodies for the original SARS-CoV-2 strain. Results: We observed that the highest anti-protein S GMTs were in the group that received a heterologous booster with BNT162b2, AZD1222, Ad5-nCoV, or CoronaVac; the group without a booster showed the lowest GMTs. All groups in the primary schemes had 90% or more inhibition for the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, except in the AZD1222 and Ad5-nCoV groups without a booster. Conclusions: Boosters increased GMTs for all people, independently of their primary vaccine scheme. Yet, our findings suggest that a heterologous booster produced higher titers against SARS-CoV-2 protein S. Efforts should be made to reach people who received AZD1222 and Ad5-nCoV as their primary scheme and did not get boosted, as neutralization in those groups was particularly low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.