ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2025
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Stool and Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal Samples: Implications for Clinical Progression in Severe COVID-19 Patients.
Article in International journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 RNA load in different specimens has been analyzed to evaluate its correlation with disease outcomes and other factors. However, conflicting results have emerged due to variations in study design. This study examines the impact of viral load in stool and nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP) specimens on the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Forty-six intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 were enrolled between September 2020 and March 2021. NP swab and stool samples were collected at admission and at clinical outcome, and viral load was quantified using RT-qPCR. All patients had positive NP RNA at admission, with 41 (89.1%) also testing positive in stool samples. At the time of clinical outcome, 67.4% of NP samples and 45.7% of stool samples remained positive. Patients without gastrointestinal symptoms had a higher stool viral load at admission. Additionally, a greater NP viral load at admission was associated with unfavorable outcomes, whereas patients with diarrhea exhibited a more rapid decline in NP viral load. These preliminary findings suggest that diarrhea is associated with faster NP viral load reduction. Furthermore, viral load clearance was more efficient in stool samples than in respiratory specimens. These results highlight the relationship between viral load and COVID-19 severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.