ArticleBrain communications2025
Targeted environmental enrichment is more effective than bipedal treadmill training after thoracic spinal cord injury.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-species identification of conserved and divergent locomotor kinematic strategies using AutoGaitA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- An environmental enrichment facilitates the recovery of lower urinary tract function after spinal cord injury through downmodulation of neurogenic activity in female rats.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Environmental enrichment as a mitochondria-targeting systems strategy across neurodegenerative diseases and retinal dystrophies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation is widely recognized as an essential component in evaluating the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention in animal models of translational spinal cord injury research. Ideally, the rehabilitation method used should be optimized for the specific injury model and severity to adequately compare the efficacy of the investigational therapy. For studies utilizing thoracic spinal cord injuries, rehabilitation primarily involves bipedal or quadrupedal treadmill training aimed at restoring hindlimb function. Previously, we reported modest improvements to hindlimb motor recovery following forced bipedal treadmill training after moderate 175 kilodyne thoracic spinal cord contusion injury, which were further enhanced when combined with the microtubule-stabilizing drug epothilone B. However, during this and other studies we have noted that B-TMT presents several potential limitations, including brief periods of active rehabilitation for each animal, variability between animal handlers, animal stress, and the focus on a single movement pattern. To overcome these limitations, we investigated the effects of an environmental enrichment-based rehabilitation that differs from a general environment enrichment strategy by including task-specific training elements, something we have termed 'targeted environmental enrichment'. This method provides longer periods of active rehabilitation, operates independently of the animal handler, thereby involves less animal handling, which minimizes stress, and encourages a wide range of movements. Our findings indicate that targeted environmental enrichment outperforms bipedal training across several behavioural measures which produced a ceiling effect that epothilone B could not overcome. Therefore, these results suggest that targeted environmental enrichment may be a more effective rehabilitation approach than B-TMT and should be considered for application in models of severe spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.