Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113664›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Experimental acute muscle pain and itch induce similar inhibitory effects on corticospinal excitability.

Bolette Harritsø Winther, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Johanne Bagger Graugaard, Hannah Grønlund Jespersen, Jesper Elberling, Enrico De Martino, Silvia Lo Vecchio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bolette Harritsø WintherCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Lars Arendt-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Johanne Bagger GraugaardCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Hannah Grønlund JespersenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.
Jesper ElberlingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Enrico De MartinoCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-3723
Silvia Lo VecchioCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain and itch provoke different motor behaviors. Pain induces motor inhibition, whereas itch triggers an active scratching response. Acute pain is known to decrease corticospinal excitability, assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) through motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), but the effects of acute itch on bilateral corticospinal excitability are unknown. Objectives: We hypothesized that acute pain and itch differentially affect corticospinal excitability, decreasing and increasing MEPs, respectively. Methods: Nineteen healthy participants completed a 2-session, crossover study. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied targeting the right and left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded before, during experimentally induced pain (intramuscular hypertonic saline injection in the right FDI) or induced itch (cutaneous histamine application above the FDI), immediately after, and 30 minutes after provocation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were delivered every ∼7 seconds, and participants rated the pain and itch intensities using a numeric rating scale every ∼30 seconds. Results: Pain numeric rating scale scores were higher than itch scores from 0 to 120 seconds but lower at 390 seconds (all Conclusion: Opposite to the hypothesis, acute, experimental pain and itch induced similar corticospinal inhibition, suggesting a comparable effect on the motor output of the affected limb. This study found that the effects of acute pain and itch showed similar inhibition on bilateral corticospinal tract excitability.

Indexed as

Corticospinal excitabilityHistamine-inducing itchHypertonic saline-inducing painItch catastrophizing scaleMotor-evoked potentialsPain catastrophizing scaleTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41113664
PMCPMC12528591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.