Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113662›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Sweet relief or lasting impacts? Review of neonatal pain and sucrose in developing rodents.

Fermin S Hoq, Colette Newby, Sophie Tremblay, Manon Ranger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fermin S HoqClinical Trials Unit, BC Cancer Agency, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Colette NewbyBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sophie TremblayCentre Hospitalier Universitaire-Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Manon RangerBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-0686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the neonatal intensive care unit, preterm infants can experience 7 to 17 painful and stressful procedures daily. Oral sucrose is the standard treatment for procedural pain, but their combined short-term and long-term cumulative effects on brain development remain unclear. Growing concerns about the potential neurodevelopmental consequences of repeated sucrose and pain exposure underscore the need for mechanistic research to understand their interaction during critical periods of brain development. Translational animal models, particularly in rodents, are instrumental in advancing neonatal pain research. Their comparable neurodevelopmental trajectory to human infants and the ability to systematically control pain and sucrose exposures make them valuable tools for investigating both immediate and enduring effects. These models have been refined to replicate clinically relevant procedural pain in the neonatal intensive care unit and have yielded mixed findings. Some studies report that sucrose reduces short-term pain sensitivity and improves early spatial learning, whereas others show impaired short-term memory and long-term reductions in regional brain and white matter volumes. This review synthesizes current literature on translational rodent models of early-life pain and sucrose exposure, highlighting both potential benefits and adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the complexity of using sucrose as an analgesic and the importance of ongoing preclinical research to inform evidence-based neonatal pain management. By critically evaluating the dual impact of pain and sucrose, this work contributes to a deeper understanding of how early interventions shape neurodevelopment and supports the development of safer, more effective strategies for managing pain in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

BrainNeurodevelopmental outcomesNICUPrematurityProcedural painRodent modelSucrose

Identifiers

PMID41113662
PMCPMC12530316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.