ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Comparison of acupuncture, moxibustion, and pharmacotherapy in improving diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visualization analysis of research hotspots and trends in traditional Chinese medicine external therapies for irritable bowel syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acupuncture, moxibustion, and pharmacotherapy are widely used for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), but their comparative efficacy and microbial mechanisms remain unclear. Methods: We evaluated therapeutic outcomes in IBS-D rats through physiological and colonic indicators and characterized gut microbiota using 16S rDNA sequencing with network and modular analyses. Results: Acupuncture and moxibustion more effectively normalized stool form, diarrhea index, fecal water content, and fecal pellet counts compared to pharmacotherapy, which provided partial improvement with residual symptoms such as faster colonic transit. A total of 33 microbial taxa were identified as biomarkers, with distinct profiles associated with each intervention. Specifically, acupuncture was linked to increased levels of Pseudomonas and Turicibacter, moxibustion to RF39, and pharmacotherapy to Fusobacteriota, Blautia, and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1. Furthermore, we also found that the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was a key factor in IBS-D pathogenesis. Key genera such as Muribaculum were modulated by the interventions to alleviate symptoms. Acupuncture and moxibustion restructured gut microbiota networks to improve connectivity and clustering, while pharmacotherapy resulted in a more heterogeneous network with a higher number of negative correlations with physiological parameters. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that acupuncture and moxibustion achieved superior therapeutic effects through distinct remodeling of microbial networks and host-microbe associations, providing mechanistic insight into microbiota-mediated IBS-D treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.