ArticleJournal of manufacturing science and engineering2025
Deposition Volume Compensation for Enhanced Shape Fidelity in Nested Printing.
Article in Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Printability to Biofunctionality: 3D-Printed Hydrogel Scaffolds for Multi-Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nested printing, a special type of embedded printing, enables the fabrication of multilayered enclosed structures, in particular those resembling biological organs. As with any printing process, shape fidelity in nested printing is of great importance to dimensional accuracy, structural integrity, and/or functionality of 3D-printed parts. Particularly, the shape fidelity may be compromised due to the upflow and the additional volume introduced by internal depositions, and the latter is not well studied yet and calls for robust mitigation approaches. This study aims to establish a B-spline function-based three-dimensional (3D) freeform compensation method to offset the effect of internally deposited volumes in internally nested structures during nested printing. Particularly, printed nested structures are visualized using image-based segmentation and reconstruction, shape fidelity is assessed by measuring deviations between reconstructed and designed models using 3D structural similarity analysis, and a distortion field and a corresponding compensation field are approximated using a B-spline function-based method, resulting in a compensated 3D model for final nested printing. This compensation method reduces the mean printing error from 9.35% to 2.02% for the first enclosing layer and from 17.59% to 0.47% for the second enclosing layer, respectively, for a canonical nested structure. Further, the demonstration case of a 3D brain limbic system model shows a reduced mean printing error from 10.67% to 1.40% for the enclosing white matter region. The compensation-based mitigation strategy using the B-spline function effectively enhances shape fidelity during nested printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.