ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025
A five-country comparison of midwifery students' confidence in facilitating normal labor and birth.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Midwifery Students' Definitions of Normal Labor and Birth: A Study From Five Countries.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMidwifery students need confidence in recognizing and supporting normal birth, the backbone of the midwifery professional role. Developing this confidence in the face of decreasing rates of physiological birth worldwide is a critical challenge. Midwife researchers from Australia, England, Northern Ireland, Poland, and the USA investigated midwifery student confidence for supporting normal birth and explored enhancing and detracting factors.
methodsA cross-sectional survey design was undertaken with 570 midwifery students at 8 academic midwifery programs across 5 countries The Student Confidence for Supporting Normal Birth Questionnaire with free text and Likert-type questions on a 1 (least influential) to 4 (most influential) scale was used. The survey was distributed between 2019 and 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests of difference. Free text responses were analyzed thematically.
resultsOverall confidence mean was 2.06/4.00, with Poland (1.67) having the lowest confidence and the USA the highest (2.88). Factors rated most influential were the student-mentor midwife relationship (3.40) and theoretical education (3.09). In addition, birth environment emerged as important in the qualitative themes.
conclusionsInteracting with a mentor midwife that supports physiological birth and is respectful of students, and repeated exposure to birth environments that privilege women-centered physiological birth are crucial to ensuring midwifery students can transition to confident midwifery professionals who are advocates for physiological birth. Didactic education that emphasizes the basic physiological and psychological principles that underlie midwifery care processes, contributes to midwifery student confidence for supporting normal birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.