Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113597›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Graphene-based nanozymes for revolutionizing biomedical research.

Astha Tripathi, Saumya Singh Rautela, Pratibha Kumari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Astha TripathiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Delhi New Delhi-110007 India.
Saumya Singh RautelaBioorganic Material Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi Kalkaji New Delhi-110019 India pkumari@db.du.ac.in.
Pratibha KumariBioorganic Material Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi Kalkaji New Delhi-110019 India pkumari@db.du.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-3926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanozymes, with nanoscale dimensions and enzyme-like properties, have garnered substantial interest as they can overcome the downsides of conventional enzymes, including fragility, high cost, tedious isolation, and expensive manufacturing. Over the past decade, a diverse range of nanomaterials have demonstrated the ability to mimic enzyme-like activity by incorporating multivalent elements into nanostructures. Notably, graphene-based nanomaterials, such as graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide, with their precisely controlled scaffolds and electronic properties, have emerged as promising substitutes for traditional enzymes by emulating the intricately evolved catalytic centers of natural enzymes, including oxidase, peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. The distinct electronic, mechanical, thermal, and optical properties enable graphene-based nanozymes to provide multifunctional platforms for various biomedical applications, including wound healing, tissue regeneration, cancer treatment therapies, antibacterial activity, and biosensing applications. This in-depth review examines the enzymatic features and recent advancements of graphene-based nanozymes, highlighting their significant contributions to biomedicine.

Identifiers

PMID41113597
PMCPMC12531997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.