Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113536›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Multiorgan Assessment with Transesophageal Ultrasound in Prone Ventilation Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Observational Study in Argentina.

Martín Isa, Fernando A Sosa, Lucía Bertorello-Andrade, Javier E Roberti, Juana Fernández, Barbara Tort, Federico Daldoss, Pablo Merlo, Hatem Soliman-Aboumarie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Expanding Horizons: Transesophageal Ultrasound across Organ Systems in Prone Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martín IsaClínica Regional del Sud, Río Cuarto, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7081-2528
Fernando A SosaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemán (German Hospital); ASARUC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-1895
Lucía Bertorello-AndradeIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemán (German Hospital), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8836-588X
Javier E RobertiNational Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET)-CIESP, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4285-5061
Juana FernándezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemán (German Hospital), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5639-0469
Barbara TortIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemán (German Hospital), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-8795
Federico DaldossIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemán (German Hospital), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3756-1433
Pablo MerloASARUC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-1964
Hatem Soliman-AboumarieDepartment of Anaesthetics and Critical Care, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3254-6820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: In critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged prone positioning complicated conventional monitoring. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was often unfeasible, highlighting the need for alternative methods. Transesophageal ultrasound (TEUS) allows bedside, multiorgan assessment but has been underutilized in prone patients. To evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of TEUS for multisystem monitoring in patients with moderate to severe ARDS in the prone position. Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in two ICUs in Argentina from October 2020 to October 2022. Adult patients with COVID-19-related ARDS who underwent TEUS while ventilated in the prone position were included. Certified intensivists performed standardized TEUS protocols to assess cardiac function, pulmonary status, and venous congestion using the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score. Results: Transesophageal ultrasound was performed in 109 patients. Assessment of left and right ventricular function, diastolic parameters, and lung patterns was feasible in nearly all cases. Right ventricular dysfunction was present in 36.7%, and VExUS-related congestion markers (portal pulsatility, hepatic/intrarenal vein changes) were frequent. Lung ultrasound via TEUS identified interstitial-alveolar patterns in 98.2%. Transesophageal ultrasound findings guided fluid and ventilatory management. Conclusion: Transesophageal ultrasound is a feasible, safe, and clinically valuable tool for comprehensive, real-time multisystem monitoring in prone, mechanically ventilated ARDS patients. It enables informed decision-making without patient repositioning, especially when other imaging is limited. Broader adoption in ICU practice could improve care, highlighting the need for training programs in critical care TEUS. How to cite this article: Isa M, Sosa FA, Bertorello-Andrade L, Roberti JE, Fernández J, Tort B,

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19Critical care ultrasoundMultisystem monitoringProne ventilationTransesophageal echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID41113536
PMCPMC12532260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.