Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113526›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Effect of Heat and Moisture Exchanger vs Heated Humidifier on Ventilator-related Adverse Events in Children: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sivamurukan Palanisamy, Sreedeep Kodakkattil Sreevilasan, Lolam Venkatesh, Divakar Jose, B C Gowtham, Narayanan Parameswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Humidification in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: What We Know, What We Need.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sivamurukan PalanisamyPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2846-2509
Sreedeep Kodakkattil SreevilasanPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4023-8440
Lolam VenkateshPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7800-7532
Divakar JosePediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6528-5012
B C GowthamPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3884-5124
Narayanan ParameswaranPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-5789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Heating and humidification of ventilator gas are essential to ensure optimal ventilator support in critically ill children. Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) offer a simpler and more cost-effective method of humidification compared to active systems like heated humidifiers (HH). However, the efficacy and impact of HME on ventilator-related adverse events (VAEs) in children remain underexplored. This study aims to compare the incidence of VAEs in children managed with HME versus those using a HH during mechanical ventilation. Patients and methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care hospital in South India from January 2022 to July 2023. Sixty children aged 2-15 years, who were expected to require mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours, were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups after age-based stratification (2-5 years and 6-15 years). The intervention group received humidification via HME, while the control group received a HH. Patients were monitored until discharge, and daily assessments were performed to identify any VAEs for the first 7 days of mechanical ventilation. Results: The primary outcome was the incidence of VAEs, expressed per 1,000 ventilator days. The HME group reported 28.36 VAEs per 1,000 ventilator days, while the HH group had 12.98 VAEs per 1,000 ventilator days. This difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: This pilot randomized controlled trial did not find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of VAEs between use of HME and HHs in children. Given its simplicity and cost-effectiveness, HME may be cautiously considered for use in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients aged 2-15 years. How to cite this article: Palanisamy S, Kodakkattil Sreevilasan S, Venkatesh L, Jose D, Gowtham BC, Parameswaran N. Effect of Heat and Moisture Exchanger vs Heated Humidifier on Ventilator-related Adverse Events in Children: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(9):746-752.

Indexed as

Active and passive humidificationHeat and moisture exchangerHeated humidifierMechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID41113526
PMCPMC12532254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.