Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113510›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

A phenomenological study of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema using the healthcare system.

Amanda Wheeler, Madeline Londo, Gabrielle Inkel, Emily Fiorenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda WheelerSacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-6253
Madeline LondoSacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Gabrielle InkelSacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Emily FiorentiSacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema, a chronic condition affecting approximately 30% of breast cancer survivors, leads to significant physical and psychosocial challenges. This study explored the lived experiences of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema, focusing on occupational engagement and healthcare system interactions. Method: A phenomenological study was conducted with 18 female participants diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Semistructured interviews were used to gather participant experiences, and reflexive thematic analysis to develop key themes. Findings: Five main themes emerged: Navigating the Psychosocial Challenges, Enduring Physical Constraints and Dependence on Others, Inconsistencies and Barriers in the Healthcare Journey, The Quest for Knowledge and Accessible Support, and Insights and Recommendations for Comprehensive Care. Findings revealed a significant mental health impact, physical limitations, inconsistent healthcare, and the need for additional supports. Participants emphasized improved mental health support, accessible lymphedema therapy, and increased societal awareness. Conclusion: This study highlights the mental, physical, and social challenges faced by women with breast cancer-related lymphedema, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to care. Occupational therapists are well-positioned to provide holistic care, including mental and physical health interventions and advocacy for improved healthcare access and resources. Future research is needed on care standardization and comprehensive interventions to address the occupational needs of individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Indexed as

Breast cancer-related lymphedemamental healthoccupational engagementoncologyquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41113510
PMCPMC12531444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.