Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113499›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of diabetes2025

Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of gestational diabetes: A critical appraisal.

John Punnose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John PunnoseDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Stephen's Hospital, Delhi 110054, India. drpunnose@rediffmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic abnormality of pregnancy and is associated with early and late adverse outcomes for both mothers and fetuses. Conventionally, GDM is diagnosed between 24 and 28 gestational weeks (GW) (late-onset GDM). With the increasing prevalence of prediabetes among women of reproductive age, GDM is increasingly being diagnosed before 24 GW in high-risk populations (early-onset GDM). Compared with late-onset GDM pregnancies, early-onset GDM pregnancies are at greater risk for neonatal adverse events, such as perinatal mortality, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and macrosomia. The TOBOGM study revealed that the initiation of treatment before 20 GW can modestly reduce composite neonatal outcomes, mainly due to a reduction in the rate of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. The benefit was greater when treatment was initiated before 14 GW. The probable mechanisms for early-onset hyperglycemia-induced neonatal adverse events are decidual and placental defects, interference with fetal lung development, and fetal glucose steal. There is no international consensus on the GDM screening strategy in early pregnancy, and its cost-effectiveness is questioned by several professional bodies. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are strongly recommended to alleviate confusion in clinical practice regarding the management of mild hyperglycemia in early pregnancy.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsDiagnostic criteriaGestational diabetesMaternal hyperglycemiaNeonatal outcomesPrediabetesPregnancy outcomesScreening period

Identifiers

PMID41113499
PMCPMC12531788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.