ReviewWorld journal of diabetes2025
Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of gestational diabetes: A critical appraisal.
Review in World journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Placental Ezrin Expression in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Immunohistochemical and Bioinformatic Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Using First-Trimester Laboratory Parameters.Cureus · 2026Article
- Early-pregnancy fasting blood glucose and subsequent GDM define four distinct risk groups for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study of 15,245 women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic abnormality of pregnancy and is associated with early and late adverse outcomes for both mothers and fetuses. Conventionally, GDM is diagnosed between 24 and 28 gestational weeks (GW) (late-onset GDM). With the increasing prevalence of prediabetes among women of reproductive age, GDM is increasingly being diagnosed before 24 GW in high-risk populations (early-onset GDM). Compared with late-onset GDM pregnancies, early-onset GDM pregnancies are at greater risk for neonatal adverse events, such as perinatal mortality, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and macrosomia. The TOBOGM study revealed that the initiation of treatment before 20 GW can modestly reduce composite neonatal outcomes, mainly due to a reduction in the rate of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. The benefit was greater when treatment was initiated before 14 GW. The probable mechanisms for early-onset hyperglycemia-induced neonatal adverse events are decidual and placental defects, interference with fetal lung development, and fetal glucose steal. There is no international consensus on the GDM screening strategy in early pregnancy, and its cost-effectiveness is questioned by several professional bodies. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are strongly recommended to alleviate confusion in clinical practice regarding the management of mild hyperglycemia in early pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.