ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
The fibularis longus muscle revisited: comparative anatomy, developmental perspectives, and clinical relevance.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The fibularis longus tendon (FLT) shows substantial anatomical variability, yet its clinical and developmental implications are incompletely characterised. Classification systems derived from fetal and adult morphology may improve diagnostic interpretation and surgical planning. Objective: To synthesise comparative, ontogenetic, radiological and surgical perspectives on the FLT into a unified, classification-aware framework. Materials and methods: Anatomical data from two previously published cohorts-one fetal (n = 94 lower limbs) and one adult (n = 100 lower limbs)-were reviewed to evaluate distal insertion morphotypes. Findings were correlated with imaging literature (MRI, ultrasound) and appraised for diagnostic pitfalls and practical applicability. Results: Across fetal and adult material, three principal distal insertion types were identified: Type I (single insertion), Type II (bifurcated) and Type III (trifurcated in fetuses or fusion variants in adults). Trifurcated Type III appears confined to prenatal specimens, whereas adult Type III reflects secondary postnatal fusion with neighbouring structures. Radiological correlation highlights recurring misinterpretations involving accessory bands and fusion patterns. Classification-aware interpretation suggests that surgical risk can differ by FLT type, particularly in tendoscopic assessment and tendon transfer planning. Conclusion: A unified classification aligning fetal and adult variants provides a clinically relevant scaffold for preoperative planning, radiological reporting and anatomical research. Consistent recognition and reporting of FLT subtypes may reduce diagnostic error, inform procedural strategy and enhance anatomical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.