ReviewSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Selection and Prognosis of Different Venous Reconstruction Methods in Laparoscopic Pancreatectomy].
Review in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive system and has an extremely poor prognosis. Due to its insidious onset and rapid progression, major surrounding vessels are frequently invaded at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein are often required during pancreatectomy. Various methods of venous resection and reconstruction have been developed, each with its own advantages, limitations, and specific applicability. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic pancreatectomy requires higher technical proficiency and more precise intraoperative decision-making. To promote the advancement of venous reconstruction techniques in laparoscopic pancreatectomy, in this article, we summarize and evaluate our team's practical experience and relevant literature, focusing on graft selection, technical difficulty, operative risk, and short- and long-term patency. Special emphasis was placed on the applicability of different approaches and materials. In addition, regarding postoperative reconstruction of venous patency, we introduced the "Cross-sectional Area Algorithm", a method simulating the evaluation mode of coronary artery patency, to accurately quantify postoperative venous patency. The evaluation method was first proposed by the team but has not yet been externally validated. By reviewing the current status of venous reconstruction strategies and the prognosis of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, we aim to inform the development of standardized technical guidelines, enable individualized assessment of venous patency after surgery, and ultimately improve minimally invasive pancreatic surgery and the long-term prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.