Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113414›Full record

ReviewSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025

[Selection and Prognosis of Different Venous Reconstruction Methods in Laparoscopic Pancreatectomy].

Jinfan Zhang, Ullah Imdad, Han Yan, Wentao Gao

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinfan Zhang( 210029) Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0968-2233
Ullah Imdad( 210029) Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Han Yan( 210029) Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Wentao Gao( 210029) Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3332-8112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive system and has an extremely poor prognosis. Due to its insidious onset and rapid progression, major surrounding vessels are frequently invaded at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein are often required during pancreatectomy. Various methods of venous resection and reconstruction have been developed, each with its own advantages, limitations, and specific applicability. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic pancreatectomy requires higher technical proficiency and more precise intraoperative decision-making. To promote the advancement of venous reconstruction techniques in laparoscopic pancreatectomy, in this article, we summarize and evaluate our team's practical experience and relevant literature, focusing on graft selection, technical difficulty, operative risk, and short- and long-term patency. Special emphasis was placed on the applicability of different approaches and materials. In addition, regarding postoperative reconstruction of venous patency, we introduced the "Cross-sectional Area Algorithm", a method simulating the evaluation mode of coronary artery patency, to accurately quantify postoperative venous patency. The evaluation method was first proposed by the team but has not yet been externally validated. By reviewing the current status of venous reconstruction strategies and the prognosis of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, we aim to inform the development of standardized technical guidelines, enable individualized assessment of venous patency after surgery, and ultimately improve minimally invasive pancreatic surgery and the long-term prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyMesenteric VeinsPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresPortal VeinVascular Surgical ProceduresHumansPrognosisVascular PatencyGraft occlusion, vascularLaparoscopyPancreatectomyReview

Identifiers

PMID41113414
PMCPMC12530989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.