ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Trajectory of Body Mass Index and Intervention Strategies Among College Students].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic risk prediction of physical fitness failure in college students: a four-year longitudinal landmark supermodel study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between Body Mass Index and Physical Fitness Index among college students: a cross-sectional study in Yangzhou, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the trend of changes in the ranges of body mass index (BMI) among students at a university in Tianjin from 2021 to 2024, and to propose intervention strategies based on the key influencing factors. Methods: A total of 1000 first-year students enrolled in 2021 at a university in Tianjin were randomly selected, and their physical fitness test data over the 4 years of undergraduate study were collected. Differences in physical fitness test results were compared among students with varying BMI ranges. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the key factors affecting changes in BMI ranges in the students. Results: The proportion of underweight students remained relatively stable, decreasing slightly from 2.5% in the first year to 2.0% in the senior year. The proportion of students with normal weight showed a fluctuating downward trend, from 71.5% at college enrollment to 69.0% by the fourth year. In contrast, the proportion of overweight/obese students showed a fluctuating upward trend. In physical fitness tests for the first year, overweight/obese students showed the best performance in the standing long jump test ([2.15 ± 0.42] m, Conclusion: Male students of different BMI ranges should focus on improving their 1000 m run performance, and overweight/obese male students should emphasize standing long jump training as well. Underweight female students should strengthen sit-up training, normal-weight female students should focus on 800 m run training, and overweight/obese females students should strengthen standing long jump training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.