ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Japanese attitudes toward cell donation in human brain organoid research: many oppose broad consent.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and IRB perspectives on biobank consent models: implications for international policy from Taiwan.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Ethics and Regulation of Human Brain Organoid Research: Recommendations from the Asia Pacific Neuroethics Working Group.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- Japanese attitudes toward human brain organoid research: broad support amid ethical concerns.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Under broad consent, donors are not informed about the specific research projects using their cells; this may lead to the use of cells in ways that conflict with donors' moral beliefs. In recent years, this issue has been raised in human brain organoid research. However, previous studies on the public's attitude toward human brain organoid research have either overlooked cell donation or consisted of small-scale qualitative studies. Methods: We conducted an online survey on Japanese citizens' attitudes toward cell donation for human brain organoid research, gathering 326 responses. Results: When informed that donated cells could generate human brain organoids, 36% of participants disapproved of broad consent, while 37% said their stance depended on the case. Reasons for opposition included the need for study-specific explanations, autonomous decision-making, emotional discomfort, research purpose, researchers' and institutional trustworthiness, potential misuse, and risks and benefits to participants. Discussion: Although several limitations exist, these findings may suggest that project-specific consent would be more ethically appropriate at the current stage of human brain organoid research. Since some public concerns stem from limited knowledge or misinformation, science communication could help change this situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.