Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113346›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems: A promising approach for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Ya-Ning Chen, Meng-Qi Li, Hui-Juan Zhang, Na-Na Xu, Yu-Qian Xu, Wen-Xuan Liu, Ting-Ting Chen, Nan Li, Guang-Yang Wu, Jie-Min Zhao and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Smart nanoplatforms for early detection and immune modulation in lung cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ya-Ning ChenInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Meng-Qi LiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Hui-Juan ZhangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Na-Na XuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Yu-Qian XuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Wen-Xuan LiuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Ting-Ting ChenInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Nan LiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Guang-Yang WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Hefei), Hefei, Anhui Province 230061, China.
Jie-Min ZhaoInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.
Wu-Yi SunInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University; Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immune Medicine, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is the predominant pathological feature of chronic liver diseases, affecting the well-being of millions around the world. If not detected and intervened on time during the early stage, liver fibrosis can advance to cirrhosis, hepatic insufficiency, and finally hepatocellular carcinoma, thereby endangering human health seriously. Current pharmacotherapies for liver fibrosis have several limitations, such as a lack of sufficient therapeutic efficacy and the presence of adverse side effects. In light of these challenges, the use of nanoparticles (NPs) as drug delivery systems for liver fibrosis has gained significant traction, owing to their inherent characteristics, including safety, stability, controlled release, and targeted delivery. Compared to conventional dosage forms, nanomedicines exhibit distinct advantages, including enhanced bioavailability and targeted delivery of drugs. The employment of NP systems has quickly gained prominence as a viable strategy for the secure delivery of hepatoprotective nucleic acids and drugs in treating liver fibrosis. This comprehensive review examines the primary categories of NPs and elucidates the targeted mechanisms underlying NP-mediated drug delivery systems specifically designed for addressing liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Drug deliveryLiver fibrosisNanocarriers

Identifiers

PMID41113346
PMCPMC12528922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.