Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113323›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Fever in Sepsis Revisited: Is a Little Heat What We Need?

Alwin Tilanus, Wilmer Villamil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alwin TilanusDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Specialist/Biological Health Scientist, Vida Medical IPS, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-5881
Wilmer VillamilResearch Center Ciencias de la Vida, Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5492-3455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fever can be described as a coordinated rise in temperature in response to infectious and noninfectious causes, which varies with the anatomical site. This adaptive heat shock response has been conserved for millions of years in vertebrates. Elevated temperature stimulates and optimizes innate and adaptive immune responses. In addition, most microorganisms have shown thermal stress-related growth inhibition, and in vitro data indicate that β-lactam antibiotics in particular appear to have significantly improved susceptibility profiles in the presence of fever-range temperatures. Despite these favorable effects of fever, many physicians consider fever a harmful event that should be treated without discrimination of the underlying cause. Observational studies have indicated that attempts to lower the temperature in patients with sepsis are associated with increased mortality. This article aims to summarize the most relevant results of the existing clinical data and provide the clinician with guidance on how to manage fever in patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

feverimmune responsemicroorganismsoutcometemperature control

Identifiers

PMID41113323
PMCPMC12530320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.