Validation and determination of steviol glycosides in processed food products.

Juhee Cho, Hyeon-Ju Park, Choong-In Yun, Young-Jun Kim

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Steviol Glycosides (E960) FromFood science & nutrition · 2026
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juhee ChoDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Korea.

Hyeon-Ju ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Korea.

Choong-In YunDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419 Korea.

Young-Jun KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 01811 Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7232-6008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steviol glycosides have gained attention as low-calorie sweeteners. The acceptable daily intake (ADI) for steviol glycosides is 4 mg/kg bw/day, requiring continuous exposure assessments. To generate occurrence data for exposure evaluations, this study validated a high-sensitivity HPLC- variable wavelength detector (VWD) analytical method for quantifying five steviol glycosides and applied the method to processed food products distributed in South Korea. The limit of detection (LOD) was in the range of 0.2-0.5 mg/L, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was in the range of 0.7-1.5 mg/L. The measurement uncertainty was evaluated to improve the reliability of the analytical results. Among the steviol glycosides analyzed, rebaudioside A and D were the most (96.8%) and least (11.7%) frequently detected compounds, respectively, in processed foods. All negative samples were confirmed by UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. The analytical method and monitoring results presented in this study are expected to contribute to prospective exposure assessments.

Indexed as

Food additiveMeasurement uncertaintyMethod validationMonitoringSteviol glycosides

Identifiers

PMID41113266

DOI10.1007/s10068-025-01963-3

PMCPMC12528621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.