ArticleFood science and biotechnology2025
Sensory drivers of liking for plant-based meat alternatives: insights from check-all-that-apply with ideal profile integration.
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-based meats have gained popularity owing to environmental and health considerations; however, their acceptance is often limited by less favorable sensory qualities. This study investigated the sensory drivers of liking for plant-based tteok-galbi by applying penalty analysis and partial least squares regression (PLSR) to check-all-that-apply data. To strengthen the findings, the rate-all-that-apply method was implemented with a separate group of consumers. A total of 200 consumers evaluated seven plant-based and one pork-based sample for overall liking and sensory attributes, and additionally selected desirable attributes for an ideal product. Compared with penalty analysis, PLSR enabled a more targeted identification of key drivers by accounting for attribute correlations. Attributes such as "glossy appearance", "sweet taste", "umami taste", "meaty odor/flavor", "smoked flavor," "elasticity mouthfeel", and "oily mouthfeel" enhanced liking, while "cooked soybean odor" and "cooked soybean flavor" reduced acceptance. The combined use of both methods offered a more comprehensive understanding of consumer preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.