Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113259›Full record

ArticleFood science and biotechnology2025

Sensory drivers of liking for plant-based meat alternatives: insights from check-all-that-apply with ideal profile integration.

Ju-Eun Nho, Ji-Won Shin, Min-A Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ju-Eun NhoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186 South Korea.
Ji-Won ShinDepartment of Education, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186 South Korea.
Min-A KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-7254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based meats have gained popularity owing to environmental and health considerations; however, their acceptance is often limited by less favorable sensory qualities. This study investigated the sensory drivers of liking for plant-based tteok-galbi by applying penalty analysis and partial least squares regression (PLSR) to check-all-that-apply data. To strengthen the findings, the rate-all-that-apply method was implemented with a separate group of consumers. A total of 200 consumers evaluated seven plant-based and one pork-based sample for overall liking and sensory attributes, and additionally selected desirable attributes for an ideal product. Compared with penalty analysis, PLSR enabled a more targeted identification of key drivers by accounting for attribute correlations. Attributes such as "glossy appearance", "sweet taste", "umami taste", "meaty odor/flavor", "smoked flavor," "elasticity mouthfeel", and "oily mouthfeel" enhanced liking, while "cooked soybean odor" and "cooked soybean flavor" reduced acceptance. The combined use of both methods offered a more comprehensive understanding of consumer preferences.

Indexed as

Check-All-That-ApplyDrivers of likingPartial Least Squares RegressionPenalty analysisPlant-based meat alternative

Identifiers

PMID41113259
PMCPMC12528620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.