Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113222›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

A novel influenza vector-based vaccine expressing ESAT-6 and TB10.4 confers immunity and protection against

Ainur Nurpeisova, Zhandos Abay, Markhabat Kassenov, Nazym Syrym, Sandugash Sadikaliyeva, Bolat Yespembetov, Kuanysh Jekebekov, Ruslan Abitayev, Syrym Kopeyev, Aisha Issabek and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ainur NurpeisovaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Zhandos AbayLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Markhabat KassenovLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Nazym SyrymLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Sandugash SadikaliyevaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Bolat YespembetovLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Kuanysh JekebekovLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Ruslan AbitayevLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Syrym KopeyevLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Aisha IssabekLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Yeraly ShayakhmetovLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Elina KalimoldaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Zharkinay AbsatovaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Sabina MoldagulovaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Makhpal SarmykovaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Han Sang YooLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Berik KhairullinMVA Group Scientific-Research Production Center Ltd., Almaty 050046, Kazakhstan.
Kainar BarakbayevLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Yerbol BulatovLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Sergazy NurabayevLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Kunsulu ZakaryaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Aslan KerimbayevLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.
Kamshat ShorayevaLaboratory for Control of Technologies and Biopreparations, Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems LLP, Guardeyskiy uts 080409, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Materials and Methods: Recombinant influenza A viruses expressing ESAT-6 and TB10.4 were constructed using reverse genetics and incorporated into vaccine formulations. Guinea pigs and calves were immunized with adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted formulations, followed by challenge with a virulent Results: Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated in guinea pigs and calves, with no adverse clinical signs. The non-adjuvanted vaccine induced the highest and most sustained IFNγ response, peaking between 2 and 5 months post-vaccination. In guinea pigs, the protection index reached +0.60 lg in the non-adjuvanted group versus +0.2 lg in the adjuvanted group. In calves, lung bacterial load was reduced to 1.83-1.93 lg colony-forming unit (CFU) in vaccinated animals compared with 5.8 lg CFU in unvaccinated controls. Histopathological examination confirmed minimal tissue damage in the vaccinated groups. Both vaccine formulations demonstrated protective efficacy equivalent to or better than BCG, with the non-adjuvanted version showing superior performance. Conclusion: This novel influenza vector-based vaccine expressing ESAT-6 and TB10.4 antigens elicits strong, long-lasting cellular immunity and provides significant protection against

Indexed as

Bovine tuberculosiscalvesESAT-6guinea pigsinfluenza vectorinterferon-gammaMycobacterium bovisprotective efficacyTB10.4vaccine

Identifiers

PMID41113222
PMCPMC12535441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.