Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113221›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Assessing European Union member states' progress toward antimicrobial sales reduction targets under the European Green Deal: A comparative policy and performance analysis.

Aina Muska, Irina Pilvere, Ilze Upite, Kristaps Muska, Aleksejs Nipers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aina MuskaFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia.
Irina PilvereFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia.
Ilze UpiteFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia.
Kristaps MuskaFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia.
Aleksejs NipersFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing One Health threat driven by the excessive use of antimicrobials (AMs) in human and veterinary medicine. Recognizing this, the European Green Deal's Farm to Fork (F2F) strategy set a target to reduce veterinary AM sales by 50% by 2030 compared to 2018 levels. Understanding the performance of European Union (EU) Member States (MS) is critical to evaluate progress and identify gaps. This study assesses the performance of EU-27 MS in reducing veterinary AM sales during the progress period (2018-2022) and estimates their likelihood of achieving the 2030 reduction target. Materials and Methods: Data from the European Medicines Agency (European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption) and Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Strategic Plans were analyzed. Indicators included AM sales (mg/population correction units [PCUs]), trends from 2018-2022, and national targets for CAP Strategic Plans result indicator R.43 ("Limiting antimicrobial use"). MS were grouped by performance level, strong, average, limited, or insufficient, using the zero unitarization method, and results were visualized with color-coded classifications. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, AM sales for food-producing animals declined by 31% across the EU, with notable reductions in Portugal (-57%), Malta (-48%), France (-44%), and Latvia (-43%). However, sales increased in Poland (+7%) and Lithuania (+36%), and the largest absolute sales remained concentrated in Spain, Poland, Italy, and Germany (over 70% of total EU sales). PCU analyses revealed uneven intensity of AM use, with Spain and Poland showing high usage rates, while Germany and France demonstrated more efficient use. During the progress period, 20 MS were rated as strong contributors, while three MS showed limited contributions. For the target period (2023-2030), only six MS (e.g., Italy, Romania, Latvia, and Malta) are projected to maintain strong contributions, whereas seven MS, including Poland, Lithuania, and Denmark, are unlikely to achieve the target. Conclusion: The EU-27 achieved substantial reductions in AM sales during 2018-2022, yet performance remains uneven across MS. While some countries have already met or are close to the 2030 target, others require accelerated policy interventions, veterinary stewardship, and stronger CAP alignment. Achieving the EU-wide 50% reduction by 2030 will depend heavily on high-consumption MS adopting best practices from leading countries.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial salesEU Member StatesEuropean Green DealFarm to Fork strategypolicy performance

Identifiers

PMID41113221
PMCPMC12535452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.