ArticleVeterinary world2025
Comparative application of machine learning approaches for body weight prediction in non-descript indigenous goats at different growth stages.
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Accurate prediction of body weight (BW) in goats is vital for breeding, feeding, drug administration, and marketing decisions, particularly in resource-limited farming systems where weighing scales are often unavailable. Traditional regression models have been applied but are limited by multicollinearity and non-linearity in body measurement data. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of two machine learning (ML) approaches - Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) - for estimating BW in non-descript indigenous goats across birth, weaning, and yearling stages, compared with stepwise regression models. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 goats were assessed at three growth stages: Birth (24 h), weaning (4 months), and yearling (12 months). Linear body measurements, body length (BL), sternum height, heart girth (HG), rump height, and withers height, were recorded alongside BW. Correlation analyses, stepwise regression, CART, and MARS models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R Results: BW showed strong positive correlations with HG and BL across all stages, while associations varied with other morphometric traits. Stepwise regression models exhibited lower predictive power, as indicated by reduced R Conclusion: ML techniques, particularly CART, provide robust and reliable prediction of BW in non-descript indigenous goats, surpassing conventional regression methods. These approaches can guide practical herd management decisions, including optimized feed allocation, drug dosage, and breeding selection, especially in resource-limited settings. While the study underscores CART's effectiveness, further validation with larger datasets and additional morphometric traits is recommended to enhance generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.