ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Building toward a standard model for perinatal mental healthcare.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare decision-making relies on models that synthesize complex components such as disease epidemiology, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment efficacy. A healthcare model serves as a framework to integrate health systems research, biological understanding, and diverse perspectives on health, enabling decision-makers to optimize access, quality, cost, and equity. The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) has underscored the need for a shared conceptualization in behavioral sciences to unify definitions and facilitate data synthesis. To achieve this, a standard model of perinatal mental healthcare is imperative. Objective: We propose the development of a standard model of perinatal mental healthcare, analogous to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, which has guided scientific discovery by defining building blocks, highlighting knowledge gaps, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. A standard model for perinatal mental healthcare should function similarly-identifying key components, delineating evidence gaps, and inspiring critical inquiry. Methods: Our work is informed by our role as an advisory council supporting Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs, which enhance healthcare systems by providing frontline clinicians with psychiatric consultation, training, and resources. These programs are designed to support evidence-based interventions across screening, therapy, and pharmacotherapy, and have been successfully implemented in multiple states and internationally. Conclusion: Establishing a robust standard model of perinatal mental healthcare is essential for addressing population-level mental health challenges. Furthermore, collaboration and governance structures for shared resources-akin to Elinor Ostrom's principles of common-pool resource management-are essential for sustainability. Scientific advances in systems modeling, teamwork, and knowledge-sharing frameworks will be critical to developing an effective, widely accepted model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.