ArticleIn silico pharmacology2025
Computational profiling and virtual screening of MEK inhibitors for triple-negative breast cancer therapy.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies in women worldwide, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) posing considerable therapeutic challenges due to its poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Aberrant activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase (MEK), a pivotal kinase within the MAPK signaling pathway, has been implicated in TNBC progression, rendering it a compelling therapeutic target. In this study, the FDA-approved MEK inhibitor Selumetinib was utilized as a lead compound to generate a ligand-based pharmacophore model, which guided systematic virtual screening across ChemSpider, ChEBI, and TCMDB databases. Thirty-three potential candidates were identified, and subsequent assessment based on Lipinski's rule, ADMET prediction, and molecular docking resulted in the selection of a single compound with favorable pharmacokinetic and bioactivity profiles. Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and binding free energy calculations further corroborated the compound's stable binding conformation and high affinity toward MEK. Collectively, these findings substantiate the potential of the identified compound as a promising TNBC therapeutic and provide a theoretical framework for subsequent structure optimization and experimental validation, underscoring the value of integrating computational strategies in rational drug design. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-025-00438-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.