ArticleDEN open2026
Successful Endoscopic Excision for a Rapidly Enlarging Esophageal Histopathologically Unclassified Subepithelial Lesion: A Case Report.
Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 75-year-old man presented with an esophageal subepithelial lesion (SEL) measuring 2.5 cm, first identified over a decade ago. The patient was followed up regularly with computed tomography and endoscopy and remained asymptomatic since then. However, over the past year, the patient developed dysphagia, and endoscopic evaluation revealed that the tumor had enlarged to 6.0 cm. Although nine endoscopic examinations with biopsies were performed, no definitive histopathological diagnosis was established. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed that the tumor originated primarily from the submucosa. Given the rapid growth of tumor size and progressive symptoms, the tumor was removed with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in an en bloc manner. Histopathological analysis revealed a SEL characterized by vascular proliferation, thickening of the lamina muscularis mucosa, and inflammatory changes. No evidence of neoplasm was identified, suggesting the presence of a reactive lesion. The patient's dysphagia improved following ESD, and no recurrence was observed during a 15-month follow-up period. To date, no reports have documented rapidly growing esophageal SELs with abundant vascularization during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.