ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
The Association Between Radiation-Induced miR-208a, Cancer Recurrence and Death Risk in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA-Mediated Regulation of Ionizing Radiation Responses: Mechanisms and Advances in Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Crosstalk between KRAS and miRNAs in pancreatic cancer: Opportunities for its diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic intervention (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Existing experimental evidence suggested that the miR-208a expression in tumor tissue from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly high after radiotherapy in vitro and in vivo, indicating a potential role for predicting NSCLC progression or recurrence. However, its prognostic value has not been fully confirmed among patients with NSCLC. Aim: We explored the association of serum miR-208a level with adverse events including cancer recurrence and/or metastasis and cancer death during a follow-up for 36 months after radiotherapy. Methods: We identified the serum level of miR-208a from 46 patients before and after surgical treatment combined with radiotherapy in NSCLC patients. The association between serum miR-208a and risk for the cancer recurrence and/or metastasis and cancer death among these patients were examined by Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox analysis. Results: The comprehensive outcomes during the follow-up period for 3 years including cancer recurrence and/or cancer metastasis and cancer death were 13 (28.3%) and 8 (17.4%), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that a high serum miR-208a level after radiotherapy tended to have a higher rate of cancer recurrence and/or cancer metastasis and a higher risk of cancer death than those with a low level of serum miR-208a. Furthermore, our multivariable Cox analysis suggested that elevated serum miR-208a levels were associated with an increased risk for cancer recurrence and/or cancer metastasis (HR=7.5, 95% CI: 2.5-24.9, P<0.01) and cancer death risk (HR=5.3, 95% CI: 1.7-18.5, P<0.05) after age, gender, smoking, drinking and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage were controlled for. Conclusion: This study further provided evidence that elevated serum miR-208a levels after radiotherapy were associated with a high risk for cancer recurrence and/or metastasis and death among NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.