Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113144›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Refeeding Syndrome in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Xue Zhan, Hao Wang, Ying Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue ZhanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, People's Republic of China.
Hao WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, People's Republic of China.
Ying BaiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a potentially life-threatening complication during nutritional rehabilitation in malnourished patients, especially those in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for assessing the risk of RFS in adult ICU patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2022 to November 2023. Adult ICU patients at high risk for RFS, identified by nutritional assessment, were included. RFS was defined as a >10% decrease in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium within 5 days after refeeding. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected from electronic medical records. For the biochemical data, the baseline (the day before refeeding), peak (highest measurements during the first five days after refeeding), and latest value (the fifth day after refeeding) value were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with stepwise selection, identified independent predictors. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve, AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with internal validation performed using bootstrap resampling. Results: A total of 132 ICU patients were included (RFS group, n=86; non-RFS group, n=46). Baseline characteristics, illness severity scores, and comorbidities, were generally comparable between groups. Multivariable analysis showed that higher peak urine epithelial cell count (OR=1.145, 95% CI: 1.023-1.282), lower baseline total bilirubin (OR=0.969, 95% CI: 0.940-1.000), lower peak potassium (OR=0.383, 95% CI: 0.147-0.995), and lower latest relative lymphocyte count (OR=0.946, 95% CI: 0.897-0.997) were independently associated with RFS risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.87) and calibration. DCA indicated clinical utility across a range of risk thresholds. Conclusion: This internally validated model accurately predicts RFS risk in high-risk adult ICU patients, potentially improving early identification and individualized nutritional management. Further external validation is needed before wider clinical application.

Indexed as

decision curve analysisintensive care unitnomogrampredictionrefeeding syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41113144
PMCPMC12535188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.