Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113139›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

No Support for White Matter Alterations in Adults With Dyslexia: A Fixel-Based Diffusion MRI Study.

Helena Verhelst, Robin Gerrits, Emma M Karlsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The White Matter Connectome Supporting Speech and Language in the Human.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helena VerhelstDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-0249
Robin GerritsDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7148-9657
Emma M KarlssonDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-1923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia is a common learning disability marked by reading and spelling difficulties. While previous imaging studies aiming to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms of this disorder have reported white matter alterations, they are inconsistent with regards to which specific tracts are implicated and in what way. These inconsistencies might partially stem from methodological limitations such as small sample sizes and the use of outdated diffusion models. To address these issues, we used fixel-based analyses, an advanced diffusion framework, to compare structural white matter organization between 35 adults with dyslexia and 34 controls across three levels of analysis (whole-brain, tract-specific, and tract-averaged). Contrary to expectations, none of the analyses yielded significant group differences. However, within the dyslexic group only, poorer word reading proficiency was linked to greater fiber density and cross-section of the bilateral inferior longitudinal fasciculus. Taken together with the existing literature, our results suggest that white matter structure might not be altered in (adulthood) dyslexia or might be idiosyncratically impacted to such an extent that group-average studies are unable to detect these changes. Future large-scale research and efforts to pool datasets across studies will prove essential for understanding the white matter correlates of dyslexia.

Indexed as

DWIdyslexiareadingtractographywhite matter

Identifiers

PMID41113139
PMCPMC12534028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.