Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113134›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Multidisciplinary protocols are an important part of enhanced recovery after major lower extremity amputation.

Christian Campat, Leigh Ann O'Banion

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian CampatDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Branch Campus, Fresno, CA, United States.
Leigh Ann O'BanionDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Branch Campus, Fresno, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) remains a high-risk procedure with significant implications for patient morbidity, mortality, and long-term functional independence. Optimizing outcomes for this vulnerable population requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach guided by evidence-based perioperative care pathways. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols offer a structured framework to improve recovery trajectories by standardizing key elements of care. This review examines the application of ERAS principles to the MLEA population, synthesizing current literature on preoperative assessment and patient selection, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization strategies, and coordinated post-discharge planning. By integrating findings from consensus statements and pilot studies, we demonstrate how tailored ERAS-based multidisciplinary protocols can reduce complications, enhance functional recovery, and promote equity in outcomes. The development and implementation of such structured care pathways represent a critical step toward improving the standard of care for patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation.

Indexed as

CLTIERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery)major lower extremity amputationmultidiscipliary teamvascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID41113134
PMCPMC12528115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.