Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113122›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

PSMA immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Killian Véron, Etienne Becht, Astrid Laurent-Bellue, Rémy Nicolle, Miguel Albuquerque, Samira Laouirem, Hélène Cazier, Clément Bailly, Mohamed Bouattour, Mickaël Lesurtel and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Killian VéronUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Etienne BechtUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Astrid Laurent-BellueAP-HP.GHU Paris Saclay, Department of Pathology, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Rémy NicolleUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Miguel AlbuquerqueUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Samira LaouiremUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Hélène CazierUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Clément BaillyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, RHU OPERANDI, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Mohamed BouattourUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Mickaël LesurtelUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Catherine GuettierAP-HP.GHU Paris Saclay, Department of Pathology, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Rachida LebtahiUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Valérie VilgrainUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Valérie ParadisUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Jérôme CrosUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.
Aurélie BeaufrèreUniversité Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: A combination of three immunohistological markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]) is routinely used to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but this panel's sensitivity is suboptimal. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression for diagnosing HCC in a series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers. Methods: We included 320 hepatocellular nodules from 188 patients in a test cohort and 87 hepatocellular nodules from 48 patients in an external validation cohort distributed as follows: regenerative nodules (RN, n = 39+22), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN, n = 38+16), high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN, n = 30+8), early HCC (≤2-cm nodules) (n = 107+24), HCC (n = 106+17), and corresponding non-tumour livers (NTL, n = 152+37). PSMA, HSP70, Glypican 3, and GS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. For each marker or combination of markers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. Results: In the test cohort, PSMA was expressed in 83% of HCC (n = 88/106), 77% of early HCC (n = 82/107), 27% of HGDN (n = 8/30), 21% of LGDN (n = 8/38), 18% of RN (n = 7/39), and 3% of NTL (n = 5/152). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA for HCC diagnosis were 0.95 and 0.77, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.83. The sensitivity and the specificity of the Glypican 3-HSP70-GS (≥2 positive markers) combination for HCC diagnosis were 0.41 and 0.99, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.80. Adding PSMA to this combination increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 0.85 and 0.86, respectively. Conclusions: PSMA alone has shown good performance in diagnosing HCC, outperforming the combination of the three routinely used markers. When sufficient material is available, adding Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS to PSMA could be recommended. Impact and implications: Differentiating hepatocellular nodules, particularly high-grade dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on histologic criteria remains challenging. In this study, we assess the diagnostic value of a new immunohistochemical marker, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), for diagnosing HCC in two independent series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]). PSMA alone has demonstrated good performance in diagnosing HCC, superior to the combination of the three routinely used markers, and could be useful in practice for differentiating difficult-to-classify hepatocellular nodules. When the material is sparse, using PSMA alone could be recommended, whereas when sufficient material is available, adding PSMA to Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS may be advised, as this combination has shown the best performance for HCC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diagnostic biomarkerDysplastic noduleEndothelial cellsHepatocellular carcinomaImmunohistochemistryPSMA

Identifiers

PMID41113122
PMCPMC12529368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.