Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113112›Full record

ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2025

Structural insights into the activity of carbapenemases: understanding the mechanism of action of current inhibitors and informing the design of new carbapenem adjuvants.

Tahlia Hatzisarantinos, Elissar Mansour, Jonathan J Du, Mohamed Fares, David E Hibbs, Paul W Groundwater

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tahlia HatzisarantinosSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.
Elissar MansourSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-1105
Jonathan J DuSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-4413
Mohamed FaresSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-3955
David E HibbsSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-2990
Paul W GroundwaterSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Science Road, Camperdown Campus Sydney NSW 2006 Australia paul.groundwater@sydney.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-2030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance challenges the effectiveness of carbapenem antibiotics as last-line therapy, due to the production of both serine and metallo-β-lactamase enzymes. β-Lactamase inhibitors currently available on the market include clavulanic acid, sulbactam, tazobactam, avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam but, while they are active against serine β-lactamases, they are inactive against the zinc-containing metallo-β-lactamases. This review aims to discuss the distinctive structural qualities of β-lactamase enzymes and to summarise the efficacy of clinically approved and emerging β-lactamase inhibitors against clinically significant carbapenemases.

Identifiers

PMID41113112
PMCPMC12532227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.