Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41113090›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2025

Sex differences in systemic sclerosis: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations and treatment.

Melpomeni Toitou, Maria Iacovantuono, Gesa Sauer, Carina Mihai, Maria Sole Chimenti, Oliver Distler, Cosimo Bruni, Muriel Elhai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-dependent mechanisms in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Precision medicine in systemic sclerosis: back to the bedside.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melpomeni ToitouDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-304X
Maria IacovantuonoDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4963-0663
Gesa SauerDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-8952
Carina MihaiDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-8817
Maria Sole ChimentiRheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-1729
Oliver DistlerDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-8310
Cosimo BruniDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2813-2083
Muriel ElhaiDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-5758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) exhibits sex-related disparities in prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes. While women are more frequently affected, men often experience a more severe disease course, including diffuse cutaneous involvement, interstitial lung disease, and reduced survival. These differences are shaped by biological factors such as sex hormones and genetic influences. Estrogens and androgens differentially influence immune and fibrotic pathways, while life stages such as menopause further modulate disease expression. Genetic mechanisms, including X chromosome inactivation, regulation of immune-related genes, and cell signaling pathways, vary between sexes and also play an important role in the sex bias seen in SSc. In addition to these biological aspects, gender, as a sociocultural factor involving roles, behaviors, and access to care, may further modify disease perception, healthcare engagement, and outcomes, though it remains underexplored in SSc research. Treatment responses may also vary by sex, as suggested by emerging studies, but sex-specific clinical recommendations are still lacking. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on sex-related differences in SSc and highlight implications for clinical management and future research.

Indexed as

epidemiologygenderpathogenesisprognosissexsex differencessystemic sclerosistreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41113090
PMCPMC12534809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.