ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Clinical efficacy of micro-implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Modified Vacuum-Formed Aligners Versus Conventional Micro-Implant Anchorage in Molar Intrusion for Pre-Restorative Orthodontics.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of micro-implant anchorage (MIA) in orthodontic therapy.
methodsA total of 92 orthodontic patients were analyzed, with 45 assigned to a control group, treated using conventional techniques, and 47 in an observation group receiving MIA-assisted correction. Comparative analyses were performed on treatment efficacy, dental structural changes, periodontal inflammation biomarkers, safety, periodontal health indices, mental health status, and patient satisfaction.
resultsThe observation group exhibited superior therapeutic outcomes compared to the control group, showing greater improvements in dental structure and higher patient satisfaction (all P<0.05). Post-treatment, MIA patients had significantly reduced inflammatory marker levels, fewer adverse events, improved periodontal health indices, and enhanced psychological well-being (all P<0.05).
conclusionsMIA proves to be more effective than conventional orthodontic methods, offering improved therapeutic outcomes, enhanced periodontal health, and greater patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.