Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112980›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Mentorship of Women in Plastic Surgery: Reflections on Progress and Future Directions.

Caitlin M Blades, Sharmi C Amin, Natalie M Guzman, Carolyn De La Cruz, Paige L Myers, Paris D Butler, Tara L Huston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlin M BladesFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver/Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Sharmi C AminSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Natalie M GuzmanSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Carolyn De La CruzDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Paige L MyersSection of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Paris D ButlerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Tara L HustonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mentorship is essential for women in plastic surgery. It significantly aids their successful entry into the field and fosters long-term career advancement. At every stage, mentorship helps overcome barriers caused by persistent gender inequities. Given its importance, assessing the current mentorship landscape and identifying areas for improvement is essential to ensure women not only enter plastic surgery but also thrive within the field. Methods: A narrative review of peer-reviewed articles was conducted to assess the status of mentorship, strategies, and obstacles, as well as female representation and intersectionality within plastic surgery. The review placed a strong emphasis on mentoring in plastic surgery, while also expanding beyond the existing literature within the field to include broader perspectives. Results: Women are increasingly represented in medical school and training programs, but significant gender disparities persist in academic plastic surgery, especially in leadership roles. Female surgeons face challenges such as slower career progression, unequal pay, harassment, and work-life balance struggles. Mentorship is crucial for boosting academic productivity, reducing burnout, and promoting diversity, yet many women lack access to adequate guidance. The scarcity of female mentors in senior positions and the absence of structured mentorship programs exacerbate these challenges. Conclusions: Expanding mentorship opportunities and strategies, strengthening work-life balance support, and ensuring access to essential resources for women are vital steps in promoting success and advancing equity in academic plastic surgery.

Identifiers

PMID41112980
PMCPMC12528596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.