ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Pathways to Leadership in Plastic Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are many pathways to leadership, but few historically were designed with women in mind. This study aimed to report on common trends, characteristics, pathways, and achievements among successful women plastic surgery leaders today. Methods: A Qualtrics survey targeted at leaders in plastic surgery was distributed to all established/active members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons as of 2023. Participation was voluntary, unincentivized, and anonymous. Results: We received 227 completed surveys, 116 of whom were women, and 90 (77.6%) of whom self-identified as women leaders. Seventy percent decided on pursuing a fellowship; the top 3 subspecialties were microsurgery (30%), hand (17%), and craniofacial (13%). Of self-identified leaders, 54.5% completed at least 1 year of dedicated research during training, 32.0% hold a leadership position in a national professional organization, 18% hold a leadership position in academia, 6.7% on an editorial board, 14% in healthcare management, and 4% in industry and politics. The top 3 qualities that women leaders felt they possessed were integrity (17%), grit (13%), and dependability (12%). Our cohorts' top 3 recommendations that younger aspiring women leaders should prioritize are identifying networks (30%), seeking mentorship (22%), and harnessing inner drive (15%). Fifty-two percent of current women leaders were inspired by their mentors who held similar positions; 39% had a woman mentor. Conclusions: Women are successful as leaders, and herein lies the profiles of what that looks like today. The majority demonstrated integrity and grit, have prioritized having an impact on the field, and have attributed mentorship and networking to their success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.