Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112949›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2025

Rational Design and In Silico Evaluation of a Multiepitope Vaccine Targeting the uPAR for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Fahimeh Baghaei, Zahra Hemmat, Amir Taherkhani, Setareh Shojaei, Ali Teimoori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design of a Novel Peptide-Based Vaccine TargetingInternational journal of dentistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fahimeh BaghaeiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, umsha.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-3274
Zahra HemmatDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, umsha.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0568-597X
Amir TaherkhaniResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Institute of Cancer, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, umsha.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-8785
Setareh ShojaeiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, umsha.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-1231
Ali TeimooriDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, umsha.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-8591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays a crucial role in cancer development and progression, making it an attractive target for immunotherapeutic strategies. This study aimed to develop a multiepitope vaccine targeting uPAR by incorporating T cell epitopes and a toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist as an adjuvant. Methods: Immunoinformatics approaches were employed to predict and select immunogenic epitopes from the uPAR protein sequence. The selected epitopes were assembled into a multiepitope vaccine construct, including a TLR4 agonist derived from Results: The multiepitope vaccine construct comprised five cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes, five helper T lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes, and the TLR4 agonist adjuvant. The vaccine was predicted to be nonallergenic, antigenic, and soluble, with favorable physicochemical properties. Molecular docking analysis revealed a strong binding affinity between the vaccine and TLR4, with a docking score of -334.37kcal/mol. MD simulations demonstrated the structural stability and rigidity of the vaccine-TLR4 complex. The computational immune simulation predicted a strong vaccine response with lasting antibody production, robust cellular immunity, and immunological memory formation. Conclusion: The proposed multiepitope vaccine construct, consisting of carefully selected uPAR epitopes and a potent adjuvant, exhibits promising characteristics for inducing a robust immune response against cancer cells expressing uPAR. The favorable in silico results warrant further experimental validation and preclinical studies to assess the vaccine's efficacy and potential as a cancer immunotherapeutic agent.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunotherapyNeoplasmsReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorAdjuvants, ImmunologicComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMycobacterium tuberculosisToll-Like Receptor 4Adjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorTLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 4cancerimmunotherapymultiepitopeTLR4uPARvaccine

Identifiers

PMID41112949
PMCPMC12531433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.