ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025
Using Machine Learning and the HAMD-24 Scale to Predict Suicide Ideation in Depressed Patients.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with suicidal ideation and to develop a prediction model for early suicide ideation risk using machine learning algorithms based on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24). Methods: A total of 374 patients with depression were included from the outpatient department of the Psychology Department at the Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City. Depression severity was assessed using the HAMD-24, while the Beck Suicide Ideation (BSI) Questionnaire (Chinese Version) was employed to categorize patients into those with and without suicidal ideation. Suicide ideation risk in patients with depression was predicted using four machine learning models: support vector machine, naive Bayes classification, random forest, and extreme random trees classification (ERTC). This superiority is attributed to ERTC's extreme randomization which mitigates overfitting in high-dimensional symptom data. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, Kappa coefficients, Matthew's correlation coefficients, and area under the curve values. The optimal model was then selected, and the factors most strongly associated with suicidal ideation using the HAMD-24 were identified and analyzed. Results: The ERTC model outperformed SVM, NBC and RF (accuracy 77.75%, AUC 0.80), and despair, guilt, inferiority complex, work and interests loss, depression emotions were the strongest predictors of suicidal ideation. Demographically, patients with suicidal ideation were significantly younger and less likely to be using antidepressants. This is likely attributable to its ensemble structure and inherent randomization during node splitting, which enhances robustness against overfitting and improves generalization when handling the complex, potentially non-linear relationships between HAMD-24 items and suicidal ideation. Conclusion: We identified the optimal model and then analyzed the factors most strongly associated with HAMD-24 suicidal ideation. The ERTC model, demonstrating superior performance, enables early interventions, and reduces suicide rates. Moreover, this model provides a theoretical reference for the development of new scales focused on depression and suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.