ArticleMedical science educator2025
Cannulation Training: Immediately Available, Low-Cost Simulation in the Clinical Environment.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite intravenous cannulation being an essential skill for many health care professionals, the training received prior to cannulating a patient is variable. Simulation is one way to refine cannulation skills, whilst minimising potentially harmful novice attempts on patients and the associated emotional burden on the learner. Unfortunately, simulation models are not always available in the clinical environment, leading to loss of skill prior to performance. Approach: We created a training package with a novel simulation model that is quickly constructed from inexpensive equipment that is readily available in the clinical environment. To complement the model, we produced six-step instructions and video demonstrations. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were used to evaluate the impact. Evaluation: In total, 67% (26/39) reported increased cannulation confidence after using the package. Comparison of cannulation success rates on real patients before and after demonstrated an increase in first-pass success from 50% (4/8) to 91% (10/11). All learners found each component of the training package to be useful and 95% (41/43) intend on using it again. Implications: Together, the six-step instructions, hand model, videos, and trainer feedback provide a complementary training package that can be used to increase cannulation experience, confidence, and success immediately prior to cannulating a patient. The equipment for assembling the model is inexpensive and readily available in clinical environments, offering increased simulation opportunities, even in resource-poor environments. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02378-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.