Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112909›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Cannulation Training: Immediately Available, Low-Cost Simulation in the Clinical Environment.

Stephanie Harper, Simon Hatton, Adam Dobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie HarperNorth West School of Anaesthetics, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7709-3194
Simon HattonNorth West School of Anaesthetics, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-7675-4677
Adam DobsonDepartment of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-4235-2043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite intravenous cannulation being an essential skill for many health care professionals, the training received prior to cannulating a patient is variable. Simulation is one way to refine cannulation skills, whilst minimising potentially harmful novice attempts on patients and the associated emotional burden on the learner. Unfortunately, simulation models are not always available in the clinical environment, leading to loss of skill prior to performance. Approach: We created a training package with a novel simulation model that is quickly constructed from inexpensive equipment that is readily available in the clinical environment. To complement the model, we produced six-step instructions and video demonstrations. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were used to evaluate the impact. Evaluation: In total, 67% (26/39) reported increased cannulation confidence after using the package. Comparison of cannulation success rates on real patients before and after demonstrated an increase in first-pass success from 50% (4/8) to 91% (10/11). All learners found each component of the training package to be useful and 95% (41/43) intend on using it again. Implications: Together, the six-step instructions, hand model, videos, and trainer feedback provide a complementary training package that can be used to increase cannulation experience, confidence, and success immediately prior to cannulating a patient. The equipment for assembling the model is inexpensive and readily available in clinical environments, offering increased simulation opportunities, even in resource-poor environments. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02378-9.

Indexed as

Cannulation modelIntravenous cannulationMedical educationSimulation

Identifiers

PMID41112909
PMCPMC12532503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.