ArticleMedical science educator2025
What Keeps Faculty Coming Back? Factors Associated with Continued Pursuit of Faculty Development.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive Expertise: An Overlooked Lens in Understanding Faculty Development Participation.Medical science educator · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Faculty development benefits clinician-educators, yet little is known about what influences clinical faculty to pursue development as educators. To optimize faculty development attendance at a federal medical school with geographically dispersed teaching hospitals, we assessed how demographic and workshop factors impacted attendance by comparing physician faculty who attended faculty development on a single day with those returning any future day. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our faculty development website database for attendee, instructor, and workshop factors among physicians attending their first workshop in 2014-2022. We employed a multivariate model to determine a relative return ratio (RRR) and evaluate independent factors for return. Results: Of 3,213 attendees, 2,204 (68.6%) returned on any future day, with 966/2,204 (43.8%) returning within one week. Surgical faculty were 11% less likely to return than medical faculty (RRR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95), an effect heightened when both attendee and first instructor were surgeons. Workshops delivered by community-based instructors demonstrated decreased return compared to those delivered by university-based instructors (RRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99). Attendees whose first workshop occurred at large teaching hospitals with an instructor traveling from main campus were more likely to return than in other contexts. Day, month, and time of workshops also correlated with return. Discussion: Our study suggests that demographic and workshop factors can influence clinician-educators to continue attending faculty development. We encourage faculty development leaders to evaluate attendance patterns vis-à-viz van Bruggen's 4Cs of competence, context, community, and career to meet the dynamic needs of their faculty. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02422-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.