Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112900›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course.

Andrew R Thompson, Amulya Vankayalapati, Neal Taliwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew R ThompsonDepartment of Medical Education, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0667, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0917-1255
Amulya VankayalapatiDepartment of Medical Education, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0667, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA.
Neal TaliwalDepartment of Medical Education, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0667, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing effective teaching strategies relies on understanding factors that contribute to student learning. Two areas that are commonly considered in this context are study habits and student learning approaches. While study habits can encompass a wide range of behaviors, learning approach is often viewed on two scales: deep and surface. Although learning approach and study habits are interrelated, they are often looked at in isolation and their impact on student learning is not fully understood. With this in mind, we investigated the relationship between learning approach, study habits, and examination performance in a baccalaureate-level human anatomy course. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire was used to determine student learning approach preferences. In addition, an in-house survey was designed to collect data related to the amount of time and distribution effort students used in preparation for examinations. Results indicate that students with a comparatively stronger reliance on a deep approach typically spent more time studying, but other study-related behaviors, such as how study time was distributed, were not consistently correlated with learning approach and learning approach itself was not a strong predictor of examination performance. The most notable finding related to examination performance was that students who increased the amount of time devoted to studying improved significantly, regardless of their learning approach. Overall, these findings highlight the complex nature of student learning and underscore the need to continue refining how learning approach is measured.

Indexed as

Bloom’s taxonomyDeep learningLearning approachStudy habits

Identifiers

PMID41112900
PMCPMC12532956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.