ArticleMedical science educator2025
The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing effective teaching strategies relies on understanding factors that contribute to student learning. Two areas that are commonly considered in this context are study habits and student learning approaches. While study habits can encompass a wide range of behaviors, learning approach is often viewed on two scales: deep and surface. Although learning approach and study habits are interrelated, they are often looked at in isolation and their impact on student learning is not fully understood. With this in mind, we investigated the relationship between learning approach, study habits, and examination performance in a baccalaureate-level human anatomy course. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire was used to determine student learning approach preferences. In addition, an in-house survey was designed to collect data related to the amount of time and distribution effort students used in preparation for examinations. Results indicate that students with a comparatively stronger reliance on a deep approach typically spent more time studying, but other study-related behaviors, such as how study time was distributed, were not consistently correlated with learning approach and learning approach itself was not a strong predictor of examination performance. The most notable finding related to examination performance was that students who increased the amount of time devoted to studying improved significantly, regardless of their learning approach. Overall, these findings highlight the complex nature of student learning and underscore the need to continue refining how learning approach is measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.