Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112897›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

'Never Going to be a Cut Above [the Rest].' Medical Students' Perceptions of How Their Personal Protected Characteristics Impacted Surgical Learning.

Zara R Zaccariah, Janet Lefroy, Brianne Wenning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zara R ZaccariahManchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Janet LefroyKeele University, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2662-1919
Brianne WenningKing's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Differential attainment is a phenomenon studied widely, but the reasons for its existence remain relatively unknown. Discriminatory behaviours have been well documented in the medical field, especially in the surgical environment, and have been shown to impact learning. This study explores experiences of students in the surgical environment which they attribute to their protected characteristics and the impact this had on their learning and attainment. Methods: A mixed methods modified ethnographic approach involving diary study and semi-structured interviewing was used. Data was analysed using thematic analysis with an interpretive approach. An intersectional lens in analysis provided deeper insight into the individualised experiences of students. Results: Students believed that others' reactions to their protected characteristics impacted how they were perceived and treated. They believed this differential treatment impacted their learning and influenced their future career prospects. Participants were not able to adequately compensate for the impact that discriminatory behaviours had on their learning. They were, however, able to suggest areas of improvement which they believed could improve the learning environment. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated discrepancies in student experience based not only on their individual protected characteristics but also upon the way these intersect with one another. This resulted in suboptimal learning, suggesting that attitudes of surgical placement staff and student peers require review to improve student experience in the learning environment. The findings of this study have implications for the academic performance of students and also their postgraduate performance and patient safety.

Indexed as

Differential AttainmentDiscriminationEqualityMedical EducationMedical StudentsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID41112897
PMCPMC12532967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.