ReviewMedical science educator2025
Deviation Factors of Medical Operational Skills in Terms of Clinical Skills Training, Assessment Methods, and Digitalized Education - A Prisma-Based Review.
Review in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decline in clinical operational skills among recent medical graduates in China presents a pressing challenge, particularly in the context of the "Healthy China 2030" initiative. This study, which is a systematic review using the PRISMA method, systematically examines the contributing factors and potential solutions through a review of contemporary medical education methods, emphasizing the integration of traditional and digital approaches. This study aims to explore factors influencing operational skill acquisition, challenges in clinical training and assessment, and potential solutions identified in prior research, particularly through digital tools such as AI-assisted learning and virtual simulation. This study uses a theoretical framework centered on digitalized medical education, clinical skills training, and assessment methodologies, using content analysis to evaluate and generalize findings from peer-reviewed literature. The results indicate that while digital tools, such as simulation-based training and online platforms, improve student engagement and satisfaction, their impact on operational proficiency remains inconsistent. Traditional methods continue to dominate clinical training, underscoring the need for a blended approach that takes advantage of the strengths of both modalities. The findings also reveal systemic problems in China's healthcare education system, including insufficient clinical rotation opportunities, lack of standardized assessment frameworks, and socioecological factors such as policy constraints, teacher-student ratios, and economic pressures. This study identifies significant gaps in existing research, particularly the absence of a unified framework to evaluate clinical skills and the limited focus on the digital competencies of undergraduate students. Additionally, demographic factors, including gender and socioeconomic status, emerge as critical influences on skill development. Further analysis suggests that future studies should prioritize longitudinal evaluations of digital education's long-term impact on clinical practice, especially its application in actual clinical situations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02407-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.